Smartphone with a core web vitals analysis on the screen.

Core Web Vitals Study 2025: Analysis of 208K Websites

Fredrik Andersson

Affiliate Project Manager and Copywriter at IncRev

Table of Contents

Core Web Vitals Study 2025: Analysis of 208K Sites & SEO Insights

Core Web Vitals Study 2025: Analysis of 208K Sites & SEO Insights

Unlocking the Secrets of Core Web Vitals: A Deep Dive into 208,085 Websites

As an SEO expert at IncRev, I’m thrilled to share our groundbreaking core web vitals study of over 200,000 websites. With Google’s ongoing algorithm updates emphasizing page experience, understanding these metrics is crucial for optimizing your site’s performance and search rankings. This comprehensive core web vitals analysis provides actionable insights to give your website a competitive edge in 2025 and beyond.

Key Findings at a Glance

Our original core web vitals study revealed important baseline metrics, and recent 2025 benchmarks from industry sources show how the landscape has evolved:

  • 53.77% of sites achieved a “good” Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) score (historical baseline)
  • 53.85% of websites had optimal First Input Delay (FID) ratings (now replaced by INP)
  • 65.13% of sites boasted good Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) scores
  • Average LCP: 2,836 milliseconds in our study; 2025 benchmarks show ~2.5s average with 75th percentile at 4s
  • Average FID: 137.74 milliseconds (metric discontinued)
  • Mean CLS score: 0.14
  • According to RUMVision’s 2025 HTTP Archive analysis, only 46.7% of desktop origins and ~40% of mobile origins meet good thresholds for all three vitals combined

Updated Core Web Vitals Study: 2025 Insights from 200K+ Sites

In our ongoing core web vitals analysis of recent data, we’ve observed significant shifts in the metrics Google uses to evaluate page experience. The transition from FID to INP represents a fundamental change in how interactivity is measured, and the integration of Core Web Vitals into Google’s core ranking systems has made these metrics more critical than ever for SEO success.

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) in 2025: New Benchmarks

LCP measures how quickly a page’s main content—the largest contentful paint element—loads. Our original analysis revealed:

  • 53.77% of sites scored “Good” (≤2.5 seconds)
  • 28.76% “Needs Improvement” (2.5-4.0 seconds)
  • 17.47% “Poor” (>4.0 seconds)

While over half of sites performed well, 2025 data shows the average LCP remains around 2.5s across sites, with optimization focusing on next-gen image formats (WebP, AVIF) and improved server response timing. At IncRev, we specialize in optimizing contentful paint metrics to give your site a competitive advantage through brand-safe, compliant technical improvements.

From FID to INP: Evolving Interactivity Metrics

In a major shift for our core web vitals analysis, Google officially replaced FID with Interaction to Next Paint (INP) in March 2024. This change reflects a more comprehensive measure of interactivity throughout the entire page lifecycle, not just the first input.

INP Benchmarks for 2025:

  • Good: ≤200 milliseconds
  • Needs Improvement: 200-500 milliseconds
  • Poor: >500 milliseconds

According to HawkSEM’s 2025 analysis, approximately 30% of mobile sites score poorly on INP due to JavaScript blocking main-thread tasks. Our original FID findings showed:

  • 53.85% “Good”
  • 37.58% “Needs Improvement”
  • 8.57% “Poor”

The shift to INP represents a more stringent standard, with only ~40% of mobile sites meeting the good threshold in 2025. IncRev’s technical SEO experts can help you optimize JavaScript execution, reduce long tasks, and improve your INP scores through our proven, compliant methodologies.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)

CLS measures visual stability. Our findings:

  • 65.13% “Good” (≤0.1)
  • 17.03% “Needs Improvement” (0.1-0.25)
  • 17.84% “Poor” (>0.25)

According to TechDu’s 2025 analysis, the CLS good threshold remains at ≤0.1, with layout shifts from advertising scripts and web fonts continuing as the top issues. CLS appears to be the least problematic metric in our core web vitals study, but there’s still ample opportunity for improvement. IncRev’s expert team can help stabilize your site’s layout for optimal user experience and compliance with brand-safe standards.

Learn about the three most important factors to rank on Google, including Core Web Vitals, from IncRev’s founding team.

Breaking Down the Core Web Vitals

Desktop vs. Mobile CWV Performance Comparison

One critical finding from our expanded core web vitals analysis is the performance gap between desktop and mobile experiences:

PlatformGood CWV (All Three)Primary Challenge
Desktop46.7%LCP optimization, render-blocking resources
Mobile~40%INP (JavaScript execution), slower networks

Mobile sites face unique challenges including slower network conditions, less processing power, and touch interaction delays that impact INP scores significantly. IncRev’s mobile-first optimization strategies address these platform-specific issues to ensure your site delivers excellent performance across all devices.

Common Issues Affecting Core Web Vitals

LCP Challenges

  • High request counts and large transfer sizes (100% of pages)
  • High network round-trip time (100% of pages)
  • Critical request chains (98.9% of pages)
  • High initial server response time (57.4% of pages)
  • Images not served in next-gen formats (44.6% of pages)

IncRev’s optimization strategies target these common issues to dramatically improve your contentful paint and LCP scores through compliant, sustainable implementations.

FID/INP Obstacles

  • Inefficient cache policy (87.4% of pages)
  • Long main-thread tasks (78.4% of pages)
  • Unused JavaScript (54.1% of pages)
  • Unused CSS (38.7% of pages)
  • Excessive Document Object Model size (22.3% of pages)

Our team of experts can help streamline your site’s code and caching to enhance interactivity and meet the new INP standards that replaced FID in 2024.

CLS Hurdles

  • Large layout shifts (94.5% of pages)
  • Render-blocking resources (86.3% of pages)
  • Text hidden during web font load (82.6% of pages)
  • Not preloading key requests (26.7% of pages)
  • Improperly sized images (24.7% of pages)

IncRev’s tailored solutions address these issues to create a visually stable and user-friendly experience that meets Google’s quality standards.

Integrating Core Web Vitals with Google Core Algorithm Updates

A critical development in our core web vitals analysis is understanding how these metrics now integrate with Google’s broader ranking systems. The relationship between Core Web Vitals and google core algorithm update cycles has evolved significantly since our original study.

2024-2025 Core Updates and CWV Ranking Impact

According to Addy Osmani’s analysis of Core Web Vitals evolution, Google’s March 2024 core update integrated CWV more deeply into ranking algorithms, with sites meeting good thresholds seeing up to 10-15% improvement in page experience signals. This represents a significant shift from the initial Page Experience update.

How the google core update affects CWV ranking weight:

  • Core Web Vitals are now fully integrated into Google’s core ranking systems, not a separate signal
  • Real-user metrics from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) determine your scores
  • The transition from FID to INP reflects Google’s commitment to measuring actual user experience
  • Mobile-first indexing means mobile CWV scores carry the primary weight for rankings

As detailed in NitroPack’s 2025 Core Web Vitals guide, these metrics now emphasize real-user data collection, making it essential to optimize for actual visitor experiences rather than lab-only performance. IncRev’s advisory approach ensures your optimizations translate to measurable ranking improvements aligned with each google core algorithm update.

Core Web Vitals and User Behavior: Surprising Insights

Contrary to expectations, our analysis found only weak correlations between Core Web Vitals scores and traditional UX metrics like bounce rate, pages per session, and time on site. However, we did observe a slight positive relationship between FID (now INP) and page views.

While these findings may seem counterintuitive, it’s important to remember that Core Web Vitals are just one aspect of the overall user experience. Recent 2025 research suggests that while direct correlations remain modest, sites with good CWV scores benefit from the algorithmic boost Google provides, which indirectly improves traffic and engagement through better visibility. At IncRev, we take a holistic approach to optimization, considering both technical performance and user engagement factors to maximize your SEO ROI.

Optimization Checklist for Core Web Vitals in 2025

Based on our comprehensive core web vitals study and current best practices, here’s a practical checklist to improve your scores:

LCP Optimization

  • Convert images to next-gen formats (WebP, AVIF) with proper fallbacks
  • Implement lazy loading for below-the-fold images
  • Use a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to reduce server response time
  • Optimize your largest contentful paint element specifically (hero images, video thumbnails)
  • Preload critical resources using <link rel="preload">
  • Minimize CSS and JavaScript that blocks initial render

INP Optimization

  • Break up long JavaScript tasks into smaller, asynchronous chunks
  • Defer non-critical JavaScript using async or defer attributes
  • Remove unused JavaScript and CSS (code splitting)
  • Implement efficient event handlers with debouncing/throttling
  • Use web workers for heavy computations off the main thread
  • Optimize third-party scripts that block interactivity

CLS Optimization

  • Set explicit width and height attributes on all images and video elements
  • Reserve space for ad slots and embeds before they load
  • Use font-display: swap with preloaded fonts to prevent invisible text
  • Avoid inserting content above existing content (except in response to user interaction)
  • Use CSS transforms for animations rather than properties that trigger layout shifts

Preparing for Google’s Page Experience Update

With Google’s algorithm updates continuing to emphasize Core Web Vitals throughout 2024 and 2025, now is the time to focus on improving your scores. While our core web vitals study shows that many sites are already performing well, the shift to INP and the deeper integration into core ranking systems means there’s still significant competitive advantage available.

IncRev’s team of SEO experts can help you:

  • Conduct a comprehensive Core Web Vitals audit across mobile and desktop
  • Develop a customized optimization strategy that’s brand-safe and compliant
  • Implement technical improvements to boost your LCP, INP, and CLS scores
  • Monitor and adjust your performance over time as Google’s algorithms evolve
  • Integrate CWV optimization with your broader link building and content strategy

By partnering with IncRev, you’ll be well-positioned to capitalize on google core update cycles and improve your search rankings through proven, white-hat methodologies that emphasize compliance and sustainability.

Conclusion: Embracing the Core Web Vitals Era

Our core web vitals analysis of 208,085 websites provides valuable insights into the current state of page experience across the web. While many sites are performing well on individual metrics, the 2025 benchmarks show that fewer than half of all origins meet the good threshold for all three Core Web Vitals combined—particularly on mobile devices where INP poses significant challenges.

As Google continues to emphasize page experience in its ranking algorithms through ongoing core updates, optimizing your Core Web Vitals is more critical than ever. The transition from FID to INP, the deeper integration into core ranking systems, and the emphasis on real-user metrics all signal that these performance standards will continue to evolve.

At IncRev, we’re committed to helping our clients stay ahead of the curve through brand-safe, compliant optimization strategies. Our team of SEO experts can provide the technical expertise and ongoing advisory needed to excel in this new era of web performance—whether you need to improve your contentful paint metrics, optimize for INP, or develop a comprehensive strategy that ties Core Web Vitals to your broader SEO goals. Contact us today to learn how we can help you optimize your Core Web Vitals and boost your search rankings.

Frequently Asked Questions

How important are Core Web Vitals for SEO?

Core Web Vitals are increasingly important for SEO, especially after the 2024 google core algorithm update that integrated them more deeply into ranking systems. According to industry research, sites with good CWV scores can see 10-15% improvement in page experience signals. While they’re not the only ranking factor, optimizing these metrics can give your site a competitive edge in search results and improve user experience.

What’s the easiest way to improve my Core Web Vitals scores?

The easiest improvements often come from optimizing images (converting to WebP/AVIF formats), minimizing unnecessary JavaScript and CSS, and leveraging browser caching. However, for more significant gains—especially with the new INP metric—it’s best to work with SEO experts like IncRev who can provide a comprehensive, compliant optimization strategy that addresses your specific technical challenges.

Will poor Core Web Vitals scores definitely hurt my rankings?

Not necessarily. While Core Web Vitals are important, they’re just one of many ranking factors. High-quality content, relevant backlinks, and topical authority still play crucial roles. However, improving your scores can enhance user experience and potentially boost your rankings, particularly when competing against similar-quality content. The deeper integration in 2024-2025 google core updates means CWV now carries more weight than in previous years.

How often should I check my Core Web Vitals scores?

We recommend monitoring your scores at least monthly, especially after making any significant changes to your website. Core Web Vitals are calculated from real-user data over a 28-day period, so improvements take time to reflect. IncRev offers ongoing monitoring and optimization services to ensure your site maintains peak performance and adapts to google core algorithm update cycles.

Can Core Web Vitals impact my site’s conversion rates?

While our core web vitals study found weak correlations with traditional UX metrics, improving Core Web Vitals can enhance overall user experience. Faster load times (LCP), better interactivity (INP), and visual stability (CLS) all contribute to a smoother user journey. This, in turn, may positively impact engagement and conversion rates. IncRev’s holistic approach to optimization considers both technical performance and user behavior to maximize your site’s effectiveness.

What does the latest core web vitals study show about site performance in 2025?

The latest core web vitals analysis shows that only 46.7% of desktop sites and approximately 40% of mobile sites meet good thresholds for all three vitals combined. The biggest challenge is INP (which replaced FID in March 2024), with roughly 30% of mobile sites scoring poorly due to JavaScript blocking. LCP remains stable at ~2.5s average, while CLS continues to be the best-performing metric overall.

How has Google’s core algorithm update changed the role of Core Web Vitals?

Google’s March 2024 core update integrated Core Web Vitals more deeply into the core ranking systems rather than treating them as a separate page experience signal. This means CWV now has more direct influence on rankings, with sites meeting good thresholds seeing measurable improvements. The shift emphasizes real-user metrics from the Chrome User Experience Report, making actual visitor performance more important than lab-only testing.

What are common findings in core web vitals analysis for LCP and INP?

Common findings show that LCP issues stem primarily from unoptimized images (not using next-gen formats), slow server response times, and render-blocking resources. For INP, the most frequent problems include long JavaScript execution tasks, excessive third-party scripts, and poor event handler optimization. Mobile devices face additional challenges with slower networks and less processing power, making INP particularly difficult to optimize for mobile-first indexing.

How to interpret contentful paint in CWV reports?

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures when the largest content element visible in the viewport finishes rendering. This is typically your hero image, video thumbnail, or large text block. A good LCP score is ≤2.5 seconds. In PageSpeed Insights and CrUX reports, you’ll see LCP measured at the 75th percentile of real-user experiences. Focus on optimizing whatever element is identified as your LCP element—often compressing images, implementing lazy loading, or improving server response time yields the biggest improvements.

X / Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest